/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15053490
>In science, the (tentative) truth of a claim is decided based on experimental verification. So science can take a claim made by a religious person and either conclusively debunk it or tentatively confirm it using experimentation. It never decides the truth of the statement based on whether or not the person says he received it from god or whether or not the person is a religious figure.
What are you even talking about at this point? Where did I ever say that philosophy 'decides the truth of the statement based on whether or not the person says he received it from god or whether or not the person is a religious figure'. Here are my posts itt
>>15050192
>>15053211
>>15053381
>>15053430
So where are you getting this from? Also, scientific inquiry IS PHILOSOPHIC INQUIRY. It falls under epistemology, see pic rel here
>>15053381
Science and epistemology both mean the same thing etymologically, namely they both deal with KNOWLEDGE
science
>From Middle English science, scyence, borrowed from Old French science, escience, from Latin scientia (“knowledge”), from sciens, the present participle stem of scire (“to know”).
Epistemology
>From Ancient Greek ἐπιστήμη (epistḗmē, “science, knowledge”), from ἐπίσταμαι (epístamai, “I know”) + -λογία (-logía, “discourse”), from λέγω (légō, “I speak”)
And science in german is Wissenschaft. Science and scientific enquiry ARE part of philosophy. If you reject all of philosophy you reject science.
See picrel for a working definition of philosophy. It seems like you don't even know what the word means.