/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16113959
didn't ask don't care

>>16046613
I had fun

>dark matter
just admit you don't understand how gravity works

>dark energy
just admit you don't understand why the universe is expanding

I'm on my 18th booster and I'm fine you retarded fucks. They were designed on computer simulations and that's why they were 10X safer than the retarded designs of the 1980s that needed 10 years of trial and error and you did all of those retarded 1980s and 1990s vaccines you stupid fucks lol..

if you actually want to look into medical doctors killing millions look into the pyramid of foods they secretly removed from the spotlight because it was literally mass murder on a larger scale than any war.

proof: you won't prove it when it's falsifiable.

>>15706124
>you can not count from 1 to 10 in 3.14 steps
says who?

I identify stupid people by scanning if they trust IQ. IQ is dead in the water. It can be contaminated by training for it and the pattern recognition it respects is often useless and worst of all it respects speed of solution above correctness lol..
> here's the theory of special relativity bro
> oh no you didn't solve it within 1:22minutes, like that retard over there who solved my 3X3 matrix of cows and dogs, you must be stupid.

>>15663294
>>15663295
you don't pass the racism test, so at least we know you're not the smartest babies in the room.

You can't prove I'm not smarter than you, and if you think that's wrong, that proves you're a brainlet.

>>15618313
>Some random Chinese guy poking a metal flake while zoomed in on a camera is proof
trve

Math doesn't exist
Prove me wrong
The realm of the Platonic forms is bullshit
>B-b-buh that's philosophy!
Yes and it's the philosophical assumption of modern math and science
>B-but philosophy is irrelevant i'm empiricooooming
Relying only on empirical evidence is itself a philosophical position
>B-b-b-but you're just shoehorning philosophy into science because philosophy is irrelevant!
Science relies on empirical evidence to carry out its aims
Relying only on empirical evidence to claim that relying only on empirical evidence is the best or truest way to conduct science or anything else is itself an obvious philosophical claim and a circular one at that
Science and math is merely a tool, it's fine to claim that relying only on empirical evidence may be the best way to create useful things, but you cannot claim you know anything real by this method
Modern science has deluded itself into thinking its own useful scribblings are actually real, and as a result are starting to believe more and more insane things and destroying the very aims it seeks

>>15587226
It's all waves of somekind

Mate Hetric.

>>15567029
Women aren't real, aren't intelligent and won't replace jobs.

'ate metric.

>>15572774
It's the SSTO you guys

I hate the metric system.

>>15557870
If they dropped by 1% every year for 100 years, they would be negative

I hate the metric system.

I still think rogozin will come out on top _somehow_

I hate the metric system.

I hate the metric system.

>>15401016
>The guy
Nigger

don't care, not getting it