/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10506431
>monotony part of your argument
Specialization does not equal fundamental differences. A program with the same function can be programmed in many ways, although some are efficient while the rest take up unnecessary processing power. Think also the pixel density in an image. Although the format is the same, the components are expressed differently.

What I'm inventing is the basic language of intelligence that does not yet take optimized functions into account. The language can be used to express roughly all cognitive processes using the most central logic of the biological neuron. Of course, I focused mainly on non-feature-detectors inside the brain, as the feature detectors do function differently but they are already mimicked with existing ANN.

>Is it because it grew up in a different environment? Or is it because its neurons function differently, innately
Both of course. But the differences should not be fundamental, and they can be expressed using the design language of my neural networks. There are many parameters that can be adjusted when we digitize them into computer simulations. And those are going to result in extreme differences between certain ranges of neurons.

Of course, there are no evidence that says when you give whales hands they are guaranteed to not learn to use tools, and detailed physiological difference between human brain and whale brain is not something that is clear.

>>10506470
>Hebbian learning through water and fish
I meant that whales see primarily fish in their environment. I also said
>Hebbian learning through texts
Do you think I meant humans are texts?