/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14706371
Same with the vast majority of nationalists, conspiracy theorists, libertarians and many other "far-right" groups that woke leftists like yourself would never be willing to defend or give the benefit of the doubt. Most people who support closed borders or free speech are not far-right neonazi terrorists. In fact, supporting free speech used to be considered a mainstream position until like 10 years ago. Nevertheless, woke leftists still want to see people getting censored, fired, and in an ideal world arrested, if they spread "disinformation" such as "pro-Russian" anti-war propaganda, or so-called "anti-vaxx"/anti-mask/anti-lockdown material.

The fact that the vast majority of people who are against NATO expansion, or that the vast majority of people who are against vaxx mandates are non-violent doesn't matter to the woke leftist. If you're against NATO or US support in Syria or Ukraine or anywhere else in the world, then the woke mob wants you to be censored, whether you're violent or not. If you're against vaxx-mandates, then the woke mobs wants you censored on social media whether you're violent or not.

imagine how much more magical and exciting a meteor shower was in the days before we have a bunch of kike media shills telling everyone how it all works

>>14525160
I admitted that I don't know anything about diagnostics or clinical medicine. I'm willing to admit when I don't know something. On the other hand, you're a LARPing retard, and you don't have the intellectual honesty to admit that you're talking out of you ass, which is why you didn't even make an attempt to address my question about evolutionary stable strategies and compartmental models -- both of which are entry level topics that literally every mathematical biologist and epidemiologist alive in the world today would be familiar with.

As I've stated, you're not arguing in good faith which is why you refuse to address any of my points or questions, even though I was perfectly willing to address the questions posed to me. If you were actually arguing in good faith, then you would have either (1) explained what an evolutionary stable strategy is, or (2) admitted that you don't know. Instead, you evaded the question, because you're a dishonest person and you're talking out of your ass.

Your writing ability is also fairly poor, and it's obvious that you're not someone who has ever gone to graduate or professional school. It's honestly pretty clear to me, and probably most of the other grad students and phds on this board. Of course, I have no way to prove that, and only you know the truth, but honestly you don't write or communicate in a manner that would be expected of someone in grad school or professional school. You're a self-righteous neolib midwit, which is why you immediately assumed that I'm an uneducated right wing conspiracy theorist, when in reality I'm a grad student in mathematical biology, and I'm neither right wing, nor a conspiracy theorist. I'm vaccinated and boosted and I work in STEM. All I did was express some concerns about censorship, and you instantly flipped out. In one of you first posts, you sperged out and called me an "obedient bitch" who "gulps mainstream media". If anything, you're the schizo.

>Apply to graduate math program
>Get an email from a professor there
>Next day I receive an email from admissions officer: Congrats, you've been accepted anon. Response required.
>Respond a few hours later
>Never hear back from admissions officer
>1 week has passed
>Send another email, this time to the professor
>Still haven't heard back

Wtf is going on? Is this normal? I'm sure they're pretty busy, and I don't want to pester, but it seems really strange that they would be ignoring me, and my online application still says that it's awaiting a decision. There are supposed to be 1 on 1 meetings between faculty and new student next week, and I still haven't heard anything.

>>12693637
D U N G E O N
S Y N T H

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ud4tNb0NHXY&t=2808s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzj-1WE3P9M&t=1924s

Also Jazz and bossa nova, e.g. Stan Getz, Gerry Mulligan, Joao Gilberto, Ryo Fukui, John Coltrane, Miles Davis

E.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6CiEN_3AQc&t=2156s

>>12593662
Here you go anon:

https://lmgtfy.app/?q=regression+to+the+mean

https://www.amazon.com/Introductory-Statistics-10th-Neil-Weiss/dp/0321989171/ref=sr_1_6?dchild=1&keywords=introductory+statistics&qid=1610915095&sr=8-6

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regression_toward_the_mean