/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11449456
I've been meaning to read Foundations of Quantum Theory for a while now.
Judging by the summary, the author is extremely autistic and maths oriented.
>300 pages long back matter explaining C^* algebras and topos theory
>>11449540
He's probably talking about Brian C. Hall.

>>11420019
Do you have any questions?
>>11420639
If x=1, then we have that f(1)=p, which is the probability of you getting a success on the first shot, i.e. without failures.
>>11421379
We trivially have that [math]1+b(x, y) >0[/math] everywhere, and thus [math]b(x, y) = d(x, y)[1+b(x, y)][/math]. If [math]b(x, y) \leq 1[/math], we have [math]b(x, y) = d(x, y)[1+b(x, y)] \leq 2d(x, y)[/math].
>can I really not find a K for all [math]b(x, y)[/math]?
Not really. [math]b(x, y)=[1+ b(x, y)]d(x, y)[/math], so [math]K \geq 1 + b(x, y)[/math]. If the right is unbounded, you're fucked. If it's bounded, you have finite diameter, and then you can use that.
>>11421719
Ahem.
[eqn](-\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}-m^{2})\psi=0[/eqn]
There's a guide somewhere in the OP.
>>11421734
This is too advanced for me, I'll have to ask the Bogdanovs.