/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8178488
>>8178500

I want to publish first before marketing and sharing my design.

I've been thinking about videos, but I've never done anything like that before.

But rest assured, within a week I will post another thread with all the details.

>>8178517

I've been working with an organisational psychologist and he already sells n-back to professional organisations for those stated purposes. The main issue with n-back though is that its boring, and people don't stick to it.

That's where I come in with my game design background, I've taken n-back and made it more fun and engaging.

>>8178520

Here is the citation to Kirchner's original work.

Kirchner, W. K. (1958), Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. Journal of Experimental Psychology

You are correct. There is a reduced effect depending on the users IQ relative to the median IQ.

Someone with a low IQ; for example 70, would see an increase of anywhere from 15-20 points in the same time span it takes for an average user (IQ 100) to gain 10 points. There seems to be a plateau point with higher IQs.

I know advanced N-Back (Quint N-Back) can push an average 100 point IQ to the high 150s, but I don't have enough data to know what happens when say someone with an IQ of 160 trains with Quint N-Back for 3 years.

My app is more efficient than traditional N-back and covers multiple intelligences, so the effect may even be more pronounced.

Though I will caveat this by saying that the IQ model is ultimately flawed and obsolete, the only reason I use it for marketing is because everyone knows what it is.

Ok /sci/ im confused.
Let's say a spring pendulum is at rest in an elevator. If the elevator now moves upwards with a constant acceleration, will the spring oscillate or just get compressed depending on the magnitude of the acceleration?
I'm leaning towards the second but I'm too retarded to get the equation of motion right