/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10539426
pardon my stupid

didnt Susskind say that when matter is about to enter the event horizon from a viewers perspective the matter will appear to slow down in time or something along those lines? (ie you watch an astronaut about to hit the event horizon and the astronaut will slow down and start to redshift or something, cant remember but you will never see the astronaut cross the event horizon)

Is this matter we are seeing in the photo from like when the black hole was first formed because of time dilation?

i am confuzzled

>>10288156
Sounds like a load of bologne semantics if you ask me. You say "time" equates a recording of a happening. Well then you've successfully identified a property of time - which as you stated earlier, cannot exist. Remember you said "Time has no properties,"? This confuses me.