/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7610901

Man, I don't know how to tell you this more plausibly than I already have, but I didn't cite anything. I am informing you how cancer works. You are rejecting this point by claiming I am some other poster.

This is important however, because while I am addressing the actual points you are bringing up, you keep either deflecting the issue, moving goal posts, or simply resorting to sulking and ad hominem.

Stomach ulcers... hmmmm that is an interesting point. First lets get to that tricky table 3 you seemed to want to examine above. The rate of heart and liver abnormalities in non-GM was more than double that of the GM group, and all other types of erosion or inflammation were higher in the GM group.

Personally I don't take this article particularly seriously, but if you are going to spam over and over again about stomach inflammation (which I find interesting because acute gastric inflammation hasn't seen anything even close to a rise in recent years in humans, despite all those GMOs we are eating), then you should at least be consistent and state that in the same study it was found that non-GMs double your risk of heart and liver disease.

But that doesn't quite fit your narrative now does it?

Regardless, I am still not that guy. And I find it ridiculous that you want to imply only one person on this forum thinks that the anti-GMO fags are retarded.

Source: I am an MD student at a top 10 medical school.