[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15421474 [View]
File: 94 KB, 940x960, 1579241628782.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15421474

>> No.15386573 [View]
File: 94 KB, 940x960, 1579241628782.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15386573

>> No.15218873 [View]
File: 94 KB, 940x960, 1579241628782.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15218873

>>15216849
t. midwit

>> No.14830527 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 94 KB, 940x960, 1579241628782.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14830527

>> No.14628582 [View]
File: 94 KB, 940x960, 1579241628782.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14628582

>> No.11878635 [View]
File: 94 KB, 940x960, 1569051485567.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11878635

>>11878614
You mean "Science!" -- you forgot the "!".

>> No.11745169 [View]
File: 94 KB, 940x960, 1563993750201.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11745169

>>11745000
checked, you mean "Science!" though

>> No.11376384 [View]
File: 94 KB, 940x960, science vs science.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11376384

>>11376337
>i'm so low IQ and so brainwashed to react in pre-programmed ways that i automatically think if someone attacks Neil deGrasse Tyson tier "Science!" then that means he suffers from christinsanity

You're probably the type of anon who when he sees someone attack Capitalism automatically thinks the dude is pro-Communism and can't comprehend someone could be against both. Try engaging your brain once in a while before you post and also try reading. The OP attacks "Science!" and mainstream astrophysics -- not science. "Science!" is a religion and it's just as bad as christinsanity.

>> No.11340638 [View]
File: 94 KB, 940x960, science vs science.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11340638

>>11340059
>current year
>believing in black holes

https://files.catbox.moe/b3aur6.pdf

http://www.ptep-online.com/2015/PP-41-13.PDF

https://files.catbox.moe/gqopm2.pdf

https://www.tau.ac.il/~colin/courses/AtmosElec/Potemra%20ASS%20144.pdf

http://www.ptep-online.com/2018/PP-53-01.PDF

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4NffTr_GMk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dk2-lH9ewuA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ev10ywLFq6E

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8y3VrrVEpI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dz2A4qXJQjc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FdWTH08u30

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q185InpONK4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHZ5O0jTH8A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kI14fpM3ouU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iz8RRN8rY00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yc9PB_4F-OU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmROfjgViLE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIgmsQOKnmk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kz-Bwi5xTTs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8lKQMEYYLw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUC_a-IMmGs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLC4MA6_Oq0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvNCWMD6so4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IdMz8PkGZM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeIHTCdOGWs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_c9M33FLH40

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-03lh_tHMJ0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TiKYvUtpJXA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hC_KkLvG22A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ot-9R2GZxp8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdYrgJrBFr0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-03lh_tHMJ0

>> No.11336354 [View]
File: 94 KB, 940x960, science vs science.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11336354

>>11334803

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4NffTr_GMk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dk2-lH9ewuA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ev10ywLFq6E

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8y3VrrVEpI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dz2A4qXJQjc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FdWTH08u30

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q185InpONK4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHZ5O0jTH8A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kI14fpM3ouU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iz8RRN8rY00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yc9PB_4F-OU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmROfjgViLE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIgmsQOKnmk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kz-Bwi5xTTs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8lKQMEYYLw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUC_a-IMmGs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLC4MA6_Oq0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvNCWMD6so4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IdMz8PkGZM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeIHTCdOGWs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_c9M33FLH40

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-03lh_tHMJ0

>> No.11307810 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 94 KB, 940x960, science vs science.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11307810

https://files.catbox.moe/8xg3z9.webm

>> No.10113512 [View]
File: 83 KB, 940x960, 1535283442866.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10113512

>a sboard where anyone that posts anything the mods disagree with gets banned

is this science?

>> No.9903895 [View]
File: 94 KB, 940x960, 1234567890.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9903895

What the fuck happened guys ?

>> No.9855642 [View]
File: 94 KB, 940x960, Science corruption of.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9855642

>>9855640
Exactly. Did the apples disappear magically because the magic numbers say so?
Nope.
There still are 10 apples.

>> No.9655021 [View]
File: 94 KB, 940x960, scienceTM416.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9655021

>>9654991
>Yet the vague message above seem to match with what countless of breeders did successfully , or people who grew plants at an industrial scale.

this is a theory going back to 4.5 billion years, we need more than "seem to match" because Lamarckism also seemed to match obeservations.

>Refutability is just a tool to get reliable knowledge rather than an iron rule

Strongly disagree. Refutabilism is the corner stone of science and proves you are dealing with empirical findings and not semantics >>9654684.

Remove refutabilism and youll end up in "God/Evolution made it that way because..." type studies, you already are in that "science as mythology" phase actually.

>>9654998
>we come from a common ancestor and we experience mutations that give us variance

only the 2nd part is falsifiable. You cant sufficiently (!) prove common anscestory by genetic similarity.

>"given some population and an environment, over time the population will display more traits of those successful in surviving to the next generation", which is just a logical statement.

correct, but that is just basic natural selection, obeserved all around. not evolution.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]