/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10032622
Calling me fat again to either make me proof that I am not which would make me look ridiculous, ignore it which would make me look suspicious or defend myself which would make me look suspicious and also insecure. It's a lose lose lose situation. That's how ad hominems work. Anyone with some brain would understand that prolonged cardarine and meth use is sufficient to make me as lean and anabolic as i could possibly be.

Let's get to your attack which focused on only one point of my argument.

If you don't give into cravings then your appetite goes up exponentially more. Appetite is not something you can just not follow through with. It will be harder and harder to abstain over time.

And if somehow you do manage to abstain eternally, then you are going to:
1) Significantly reduce your metabolism which will lead to lethargy.
2) Drastically change your hormone profile including a reduction in testosterone
>www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3569090/
3) You will have a significant increase in cortisol which will cause hypertrophy, neurodegeneration etc...
>www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2895000/

And great evidence you've put through. Back to /pol/ or whatever board you crawled from. Your hate for weak/leftist or w/e agenda has turned you into the same abomination that lacks basic capabilities for a logical assessment of an argument.


>>10032684
This is my area of study. I am an undergrad physiologist in my final year. I am surprised at the amount of people not interested in pharmacological or other body modification techniques that could considerably improve your functioning or well being yet continue to employ such methods at a superficial and ineffective level ("drinking coffee").