/sci/ - Science & Math

[math] \displaystyle\rlap { \lower{-1.5em}{You ~can't~ travel }} \rlap { \lower{-1.9em}{Cant}} \rlap { \lower{-2.5em}{ ~~~~~~~~can't ~travel~ the~ speed}} \rlap { \lower{0.6em}{of~ light}} \rlap { \lower{0.5em}{of ~~light}} \rlap { \lower{1.9em}{only~ a~ fraction}} \rlap { \lower{2.5em}{ ~~~~~fraction }} \rlap { \lower{2.7em}{ ~~~~~~fraction }} \rlap { \lower{3.4em}{ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0.999^{9^{9^{9^{9^{9^{9 ^{9^{9^{9^{9^{9^{9^{9}} }}}}}}}}}}}}} \rlap { \lower{3.5em}{ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=1}} \rlap { \lower{3.4em}{ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=1}} \rlap { \lower{4.2em}{you~ can ~travel ~at ~the ~speed ~of ~light}} \rlap { \lower{4.25em}{you~ can ~travel ~at ~the ~speed ~of ~light}} \rlap { \lower{4.1em}{you~ can ~travel ~at ~the ~speed ~of ~light}} \rlap { \lower{4.7em}{you~ can ~travel ~at ~the ~speed ~of ~light}} [/math]

>>12708688
WELCOME
TO
THE
MACHINE

>>12700620
>>12700641
It's actually bothering me now-- how fucking young are you that you'd react this way? It's like you've never participated in academia. Tooker is a genuinely smart guy. As schizos come, he's very nearly sane. If you disagree, you simply haven't seen how demented schizos can get, particularly the academic ones. Tooker isn't anything like that crowd, believe me.

op, look at this.. check this shit out

>>12501383
yeah sure

fellas, look at this.. check this shit out

op, look at this.. check this shit out

Noob here. Let's say I have a spacecraft that can travel at the speed of light and I decide to go to Proxima Centauri which is about 4.3 LY away if I'm not mistaken. That trip should last about 4.3 years for someone who's already at Proxima Centauri and is waiting for me to arrive. But how much time would that trip last for me?

Can science explain this?

op, look at this.. check this shit out

>>11280929
>>11281195
>>11281197
>newfags can't wrap their heads around /sci/ culture
why are you even here?
>>11281197
As if a few retarded teenagers could solve a puzzle that has plagued math professors for centuries.

Barnett's Theorem.

If you get it, you get it.

so what are you going to name the del operator that turns quadriple integral into closed volume
3D-2D closed -> divergence
2D-1D closed -> stokes
4D-3D closed -> ?

How do I use Barnett's identity to prove that 0.9999...=/=1

Replace "k" with the speed of light.

>>6934730
Neato

>>6871324
OH BOY HERE WE GO

/sci/'s favourite.

>>6696255
Bingo

It has to do with Barnett's fundamental identity.

Just plug -1/12 into the equation and solve for x and y.

>>6690226
Barnett's Theorem.

>>6638061
Perhaps the complexity could be described as lacking, but the sheer beauty and implications of this equation leave me awestruck.

You forgot the most important equation. It fundamentally changed our understanding of 21st century physics.