/sci/ - Science & Math

The D1-mAChR4-heterodimer has interesting complementation over D21 peptide and therapeutic value: For where must we accommodate these trigger points Interestingly, M4 receptors are coexpressed with D1 dopamine receptors in a specific subset of striatal medium spiny neurons that contain GABA as the major neurotransmitter and give rise to the so-called striatonigral pathway. I mean my goodness, the plausible nature of our inverse impliance on GABA sensible muscarinic inhibition of D1 dopamine receptor-mediated cAMP stimulation in the striatum is ferocious for our cognitive endeavors inertially. M4 mAChRs plays a critical role in modulating several important dopamine-dependent behaviors such as goop splatting, which people don't have this ability? For creationary monuglorification, https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/muscarinic-acetylcholine-receptor-m4 .https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.96.18.10483

I heard Zorich supposedly is better for self-study and has all the stuff Rudin covers these days. It's apparently much more comprehensive too, albeit slower. You think it can replace baby Rudin? Thought of going through it but additionally doing Rudin's exercises since they're apparently really great.

A couple days ago i nasal sprayed one vial of deferoxamine over the span of an hour. I dissolved it in a milliliter of bacteriostatic water so it was a lot of liquid to spray which a lot leaked out front and back of my nose but i let it absorb in skin as i didn’t want any coming out to go to waste. Basically I experienced very apparent alterations regarding internal dialogue, flow of thoughts, depth of thoughts, and generally feeling more in control. Very positive experience with how it affected mind, mood, emotions, and behavior. Later that day of using it, I felt like it was doing something physically to my brain in a way that almost can be described as minor-brief muscle spasms on random areas in my head, like synapses were having a rave of some sort, and connections were being built. Maybe this was all related to the VEGF enhancing properties. I also believe intranasal deferoxamine can intensely relieve tolerance to other drugs. Personally, one huge bonus is that intranasal deferoxamine is super friendly to the nose, promoting a constant clear airway ever since my first time using it. I had nasal problems for a few years now, with clogging, excess mucus, sleeping and waking up with blocked nasal passages, general nasal discomfort. I really hope DFO is a longterm panacea for all this, just made it super satisfying to feel fresh air penetrating smoothly into my nose/membranes. I will try DFO again next week, likely 200mg intranasal(trying my best not to let it leak from where its supposed to absorb). The DFO that got on my hands made my skin feel good and different, at the time I was wondering if it was strongly affecting my sensory pathways, enhanced senses seems very plausible with DFO intranasal. I did experience some kidney discomfort a few hours after using DFO that lasted until i woke up the next morning, and I would like to hear if anyone using intranasal dfo experiences the same thing because a study showed acute renal injury from systematic dfo.

A Symposium by Dr. Raymond-Robichaud on how to learn math more effectively just dropped: https://youtu.be/RW4TDrrffgc

TL;DR:
>Problems in textbooks often only prepare you for exams, it's not free learning
>free learning is answering problems you come across yourself while reading these books
>math is learned properly w/ SRS
>you need to break down proofs into smaller chunks, which you turn into flashcards. Dr. Raymond-Robichaud recommends reading this to learn how to https://jmvidal.cse.sc.edu/library/lamport95a.pdf
>all your learning should center around some SRS software (Anki, SuperMemo, Mnemosyne, etc.)
>math curriculae work for massive classrooms but are terrible for free learners: learn what interests you and recursively look things up you need to learn to understand it
>academia has a set curriculum because it seeks to mass-produce students capable of solving a specific set of problems, which may or may not interest you
>Create all your flashcards from scratch
>What branch of math you naturally memorize better is the field that truly interests you
>There are always an infinite amount of proofs and memorizing a large variety/making your own tailored proof out of all the proofs is integral for true understanding
>always learn before memorizing/making a flashcard
>how to generalize a mathematical problem: look at a theorem and remove all inessential hypotheses
>Books for specialists that don't need to pass exams/follow a curriculum but do need to do research are the best math books; avoid books written for courses
>create chunks of assumptions and use these chunks as a single adjective in later flashcards
>Wikipedia is great for introductions but not much else
>Incremental reading doesn't work for math
>never learn an uninteresting theorem (= not necessary for proving things that interest you)
>Why memorize proofs? You will not create something new unless it's in your mind. Thus, to advance in specialized fields, you'll need to have its basics memorized

What does /med/ think of intranasal breast milk therapy?
There's studies of intranasal breast milk in infants significantly reducing brain injury
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30386923/
https://scienceblog.com/529931/treatment-uses-breast-milk-up-the-nose-of-preemies-to-save-life/

you can take human breast milk even and put it into dfo and use that intranasally
Deferoxamine increases the proliferation of neurons from neural progenitor cells and increases stem cell proliferation and pluripotency
using dfo intranasally during a stem cell transplant would force all of those to be trafficked to the brain tissues in a more accurate fashion

the average deferoxamine snorter

Go head - try to disprove me, use the scientific method. Or measure a ball on a string demonstration and accept that the results confirm that angular energy is not conserved

You cant disprove me,, and I will send my findings to Edward Witten tonight. Unlike you guys he will not attack the author and instead accept the mathematical evidence
His EMail is witten@ias.edu I will tell him about 4chan