/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3201024
Wow that is horrible, like ancient alien astronaut horrible..
Part 3 really gets shaky. Compare the amount of time the 'skeptics' spend on camera compared to the conspiracy theorists.. Almost every statement made is "oh yeah that's wrong because they're ignoring facts.." but they don't give the facts.

"oh yeah that Loose Change totally owned by Popular mother fucking AMERICAN Mechanics" -- bam -- where's your peer-reviewed pay-check?

"oh yeah people who believe in conspiracy theories.. they're just trying to be a hero in a make believe story" -- bam -- psychologically profiled

"oh yeah those smoke plumes.. building is like an accordion" -- bam -- myth busted

"oh yeah the building not taking longer to fall.. those claims are simply not factual" -- bam -- get those claims outta here!

"oh yeah those people that said they heard explosions, they didn't say they heard bombs and last time I check, firemen aren't FBI agents" -- bam -- get those imbeciles outta here!

"Oh yeah we might not have pictures of the plane from the kazillion CCTV cameras but we have hundreds of witness, plane pieces and body parts [citation needed]" -- bam -- real-life EYE-witnesses not EAR-witnesses!

"Oh yeah those stand down orders, just look at all the holes in Secretary Norman Mineta's story, which aircraft SECRETARY??" -- uhh -- this one sucks and those annoying faggots won't drop it [EXPERT OPNION].

"oh yeah NORAD failed, conspiracy theorists think the government can actually work" -- bam -- WHAT DO YOU LIVE UNDER A ROCK?

still watching... I'm having fun...

Hey scared science fanboys, explain this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxLHf3u9ayA

Maybe my conspiratorial and paranormal confirmation bias is at work but I'm not sure how to not have a confirmation bias since, like, everything is theoretical.