[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.11001988 [View]
File: 18 KB, 485x443, 1518245437203.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11001988

>>11000300
>>11000327
This anon talks much more like a usenet boomer than like a reddit fag. He probably does professionally run shell scripts desu

>> No.10873752 [View]
File: 18 KB, 485x443, 1518245437203.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10873752

>>10873581
>If you ask what "energy" is in the title of your thread, people are going to talk down to you.
Asking if there is a simple physical intuition behind a concept, to help visualize or understand, is perfectly fine. If you dropped "kinetic energy" onto Archimedes, he would ask the same question. As for affability, nice try faggot. He was rude and deserved no better.
>>10873600
>Energy will be like a universal currency
I understand that much -- an intriguing and beautiful and very very useful unification of the various known kinds of "work" and "power". What I don't have is an intuitive grasp of the formal equations:
>Why is something moving at 5m/s five times harder to accelerate than something moving at 1m/s? And why is acceleration at small speeds like 0.001 so VERY cheap?
The fact that uncreative people are calling this a stupid question, suggests to me that creative people have already thought long and hard about it and turned up nothing. But I thought I'd put it out there anyway. There are, after all, some geniuses on the chans.

>> No.10225685 [View]
File: 18 KB, 485x443, 1518245437203.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10225685

0 and 0/10

>> No.10209569 [View]
File: 18 KB, 485x443, 1518288398301.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10209569

>his knowledge is limited to just one (1) field of one (1) branch of science

what does it feel like being a brainlet?

>> No.9761365 [View]
File: 18 KB, 485x443, 1518320917009.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9761365

Chad fucks whtat he shoudl because betas should die.

>> No.9758302 [View]
File: 18 KB, 485x443, 1521419025625.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9758302

what are some /sci/ approved youtube channels?

>> No.9704445 [View]
File: 18 KB, 485x443, 1518320917009.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9704445

> Long nose and slant eye tribes count on fingers. Chub bash long nose and slant eye tribes and get pussy.

>> No.9628571 [View]
File: 18 KB, 485x443, cavechad.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9628571

>>9628549
this guy has the right idea but worded confusingly, I believe he means "we evolved from them" with "them" meaning the common ancestor Homo sapiens share with Homo neanderthalensis (which is Homo erectus)

basically, there is some amount of overlap in the phylogeny of Homo sapien populations and Neanderthal populations. it's mostly regional, but happened over a long time. also, because the global concurrent population of Neanderthals was always drastically lower than Homo sapiens, the only Neanderthal populations that didn't die outright were bred into assimilating into Homo sapien populations, hence the slight Neanderthal DNA

>> No.9602162 [View]
File: 18 KB, 485x443, 1518320917009.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9602162

>>9602146
>beta boys dumb like rock

>> No.9567946 [View]
File: 18 KB, 485x443, 1518320917009.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9567946

>X=>B
>-X=>B
Where X is unknown.

>> No.9560257 [View]
File: 18 KB, 485x443, 1518320917009.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9560257

>>9560185
>>9560205
For those who are following along, and want to see how to solve these problems, I orginally did not see al the strategies which is how I got into a productive discussion with Mr. A+.

You get all the strategies just by seeing that with three members each members only sees two bits of information which can be H or T (1 or 0). This is either a basic linear relationship mod2 or a logical gate. Either way is the same. I think putting the strategies in terms of logic is easier to understand. Given information from two sources of 0 or 1 you player can:
Always Play
Never Play
OR Play
XOR Play (the winning strategy)
And Play
Negative And Play (forgot about this one)
All players play the same strategy no matter what. So you plug in and get the expected value of the payouts.
I'm tired and have been working on a hundred things tonight. Take care, friends.

>> No.9557890 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 18 KB, 485x443, 1518320917009.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9557890

Riemann Geometry
Am I correct to conclude that the following is wrong/mistranslated?
>The number of parallel lines that can be drawn through a given point to a given line is one in Euclid's geometry, none in Riemann's, and an infinite number in the geometry of Lobachevsky. Let. us add that Riemann's space is finite, although unbounded in the sense which we have above attached to these words.
http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Extras/Poincare_non-Euclidean.html

You can't have a parallel line to a line/loop connecting polar opposite coordinates, but you can any other sets of points. Right?

>> No.9549929 [View]
File: 18 KB, 485x443, 1518320917009.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9549929

I can't concentrate on programming. I feel so pathetic, because it isn't hard, and it is not like I am that smart, but I can't focus on that shit for more than 15 minutes.

If you have cash, like 350 bucks, you can get a personal subscription to Wolfram Language and it has neural network programming built in. It would be the easiest stepping stone.

>> No.9540192 [View]
File: 18 KB, 485x443, 1518320917009.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9540192

>chub like pussy

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]