/sci/ - Science & Math

convince me why i shouldn't double major in Electrical Engineering/Computer science, /sci/.

>>8549282
>Your ideology

Finally, you admit it's simply a discussion of ideology. Please reduce it to a problem of ideology, not of biology., and discuss it within that framework There are sexes and they perform functions relevant to their definition--this is empirical data. There are outliers which are the result of genetic defects; however, that does not invalidate the utility of sexes or their empirical nature. Some people have less than two arms. They are not uni-armers, some new facet of humanity unknown and kept secret by the hegemonic science bi-armist machine. Rather, they are bi-armers who've befallen a genetic or some other deformity. There are tractable reasons consistent within the bi-arm framework for why they appear as uni-arms--and these reasons are empirical.

If your issue is about the categorization and subsequent treatment of those who don't identify with their sex, that's not a scientific issue--but one of ideology, 'norms', society, etc.

>Maybe, but I don't think we have access to it

The thing you're rejecting is science. There are realities outside of ideology--empirical truths. You can run around issues of models and frameworks and the reliability of others' measurements you haven't yourself perceived, but they are repeatable and withstand the test of time. Ideology is not. Liberal arts are not.

>>8496656

>>8168513
>Homosexuality is not considered a mental illness due to it being chiefly biological
>we humans strive to be more than our biology