/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9136040
first off im in favor of anything that promotes ecological consciousness, liberty and equality.
I think including feminism is a bit redundant, the biocentric egalitarianism espoused by deep ecology already implies gender equality. Sure pic related is making a fuzzily valid point that ought to be brought up but im unsure if it deserves its own "ism". While i think deep ecology should have diverse lines of thinking i think the compartmentalization of the movement may hinder its ability to 'move'.
ecological fascism (a term i excluded from my vocabulary up until i read this post>>9137159 which convinced me to do otherwise) is just an enduring fascist(sensu lato) entity acting at higher scale, its safe to say that a society that demands the subservience of women is a perduring process of fascism in general that supervenes on the particular.
>inb4 you disagree
please do so with an argument. deep ecology is a concept rooted in science and philosophical analysis, if you have a criticism you best make it the same.

>>9138442
nah its just a suffix constructed to umbrella like-ideologies into a single entity.
Its the process that ism represents that is so toxic. Ironically individualism is the antidote, that and ontology/semiotics(to understand the problem with such constructs in the first place)

>>9072351
oh dad were all devo


Extinction of experience: the loss of human–nature interactions
http://rdcu.be/uAS3/
>>9072347
we have way less freedom. go try to live on some uninhabited land for free. Labor is an evolutionary novel construct.

>>9069358

f

>>8965376
>ecosystems
>entry level
reee why don't Marco biologists get any respect among plebs

>>8960292
improved meme