/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9038631
Where's the word lifetime there?

>>9005843
>Mathematics is reaching its limits

>>8982628
you're clearly the retard here

learn to read, maybe much much more slowly than you currently are, zorich is right and you're just a brainlet

>>8963627
>I've never really seen some kind of introductory book on motives, just scattered research papers
also on this point is it fair to compare motives to something like L-functions, where the definition depends on the setting but all L-functions generally have the same flavor? and so we wouldn't expect a book on 'general' motives like we wouldn't expect a book on 'general' L-functions

>>8950898
>jobs. They have jobs. Jobs that dont involve a name tag.

>>8942492
>bothering to post such a meaningless post
next?

>think

>>8810092
what about it will advance our society?

>>8806133
>You know how easy it is to completely bullshit a paper in modern algebra?
remember when you said this?

still waiting on one of these papers

>>8788347
but OP said
>after it has been accepted by the mathematical community

>>8784699
I have many questions, few pictures.

>>8780677
>if you can't define pointless or unprofitable research then you won't be able to (un)attribute profit to any particular sequence of steps
again, i don't care about pointlessness, we're talking about profitability, and the definition of profitable has already been provided, so anything not satisfying profitable is obviously unprofitable.

>>8780680
in that post i am replying to 'do you have a short term memory?'
do you see an argument there? 'do you have a short term memory?' is not an argument by any stretch of the imagination

try again.

>>8780682
this funding proposal is something IN REALITY which has been agreed to by multiple parties, so it's much more 'real life' then whatever alternative you're proposing

>>8779209
>This is a lie.

>>8777119
so you're recommending books you haven't even read?

>>8766173
ur 1st day on 4chan?

>>8752362
Feel free to trace it back to something then.

>>8745211
>Real analysis?
was n not supposed to be a real number?

what would you prefer to call it retard?

>>8726680
>That's not how sigma fucking works.
kys brainlet

>>8722717
who am i?

>>8708509
>he's right winged

Is citing a textbook exercise to reference a mathematical fact considered to be in bad taste?