/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14979815

>>11674813

>>11632377
>The peer review seems more trustworthy than the reviewers to me
That's fine, but don't mistake that judgement for actual justified knowledge. You have no idea who the reviewers/editors are and know nothing about if they are biased or not.
Rather than make a judgement on the entire situation based on the largely unknown aspect that's unrelated to the science itself, it'd be better to make a judgement based on whether the published criticisms are legitimate scientific arguments:
https://www.eneuro.org/content/7/2/ENEURO.0149-20.2020#DC1
In the Extended Data they state their reasons. It's also noteworthy that the peer-reviewers are included in this process, although I'm sure you'll decide the peer-reviewers are infallible, were pressured into it, and don't genuinely believe in the retraction.

>>11577540
Scientifically speaking, is race baiting allowed on /sci/?

>>11308374
Having done less than 10 minutes of digging here are some of the experiments. The first one is from 1969 when the only mission to have put a retroreflector on the moon was Apollo 11.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17769756
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/182/4109/229
https://cddis.nasa.gov/lw17/docs/presentations/session14/02a-Murphy_LLR.pdf

>>11247634
ITT: The /pol/ tourists flip out after learning that someone might care about social justice

>>11234524
>Being skeptical because you don't like the results

>>11140331
>What exactly is "neurosexism"?
It is the myth that men and women have different brains.

Well everyone thanks for proving that I shouldn't even bother with this board

>>10675691
>Sears & Zemansky
my nigga

I know I did. Failed a ton of math classes in HS and when I was doing my bachelors' on an unrelated field, now I'm pursuing a pure math major and among the top of the class. This kind of thing happens largely because math education is shit and often gives people the wrong idea about what the subject is about. I suggest you read Lockhart's "A Mathematician's Lament" where he makes a similar point: https://www.maa.org/external_archive/devlin/LockhartsLament.pdf

Terence Tao and many others have also written articles attacking the idea that one has to be some sort of genius or child prodigy to study maths: https://terrytao.wordpress.com/career-advice/does-one-have-to-be-a-genius-to-do-maths/

>>9607887
LSD is the only SSRI you should be taking

>>9495076
Thanks anon

>>9478700

>>8956644
Yes, because the definition of intelligence is the ability to quote the way you're used to it. Well done you genius