[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.9620781 [View]
File: 62 KB, 381x302, 1517986503167.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9620781

>>9620737
Yeah. It seems like the guy is having a pretty rough time. Maybe someday he will learn to accept himself and his engineering passion without trying to shit up other fields.

>>9620738
>chemistry won't give you nearly as a wide range of job fields to apply to as engineering
That's beside the point. Chemistry and philosophy are merely placeholders for any two distinct fields (which engineering and mathematics are, regardless of what you and other engineering filth tries to claim). You seem to be incapable of tackling basic abstractions. No wonder you can't get a job as a researcher.
>No.
So you think that math departments are an appropriate place for engineering merely because retards like you can't make proper life choices such as going to engineering school or learning engineering on the side (outside of math departments) if they can't handle the risks involved with majoring in mathematics? I don't think someone who really believes that everyone has to accommodate his poor decisions can be reasoned with.
>chem is more irrelevant to philosophy than engineering is to math
In what way precisely is engineering (something which isn't used in math) "relevant" to math?
>If you think it's about being "smart" then you are completely fucking retarded
Not having extremely low intelligence is a prerequisite which clearly neither you nor your friends possess.
>Having a job on the side so you don't become a hobo or have to do some other major isn't a bad backup plan.
Try actually reading my posts before replying to them. I never claimed that having a job on the side is a bad backup plan for those who aren't in any way mathematically exceptional. But having a side job is clearly possible without trying to poison math departments with engineering. That should be obvious even to someone like you.

>> No.9567763 [View]
File: 62 KB, 381x302, 1517847619942.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9567763

>>9567512
>Will I BTFO everyone if I read the canon (Rudin's Analysis, Munkre's Topology, Knuth's Concrete Mathematics, etc) in addition to what I do in undergrad?

>> No.9518079 [View]
File: 62 KB, 381x302, 1517847619942.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9518079

>>9517151
>Why do we care about the Feller property
We don't care about engineering properties around here.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]