/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12768136
And by using the more expensive variants rather than the 3 recovered booster one.

>>12768141
>Musk is both lowering costs and isn't at the same time, he's such a Genuis!

>>12768146
>Musk is making money hand over fist, reuseability is really saving money.
>Why aren't the costs getting lowered further?
>You just want him to do it for free!

>>12768174
>They're not losing out and making up the costs elsewhere! They must be huge savings with resuability, THE ARE THEY ARE THEY ARE!

>>12496283
>making science

>>12464811
>4x+6x=9x(2x)2+(2x)(3x)=(3x)2 let a=2x,b=3x then a2+ab=b2,a,b∈R>0a2+ab−b2=(a+ib)2−2abi+ab=(a+ib)2−ab(2i−1)=(a+ib)2−ab(5√ei(π−tan−12))⋯(1)=(a+ib)2−(ab5√−−−−−√eitan−1φ)2=X=0, where φ=1+5√2Re(X)=a2−b2−ab5√cos2(tan−1φ)+ab5√sin2(tan−1φ)⋯(2)=a2−b2−5√ab11((4−5√)−(7−5√))=a2+35√11ab−b2=0∴a2+35√4ab=b2∴4x+6x=9x⟺4x+(35√11)6x=9x∴x≈1.1868⟺x≈0.7407(⊥)((1):tan−122=tan−1φ−1,tan−1φ+tan−1φ−1,=π2)((2):cos2(tan−1φ)=1φ2+1=4−5√11,sin2(tan−1φ)=φ2φ2+1=7−5√11)