[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.8868379 [View]
File: 95 KB, 475x428, 1461150579573.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8868379

>>8868356
>Did you just "etc." over the Dems finally actually being the ones to do it during the last presidential administration?
Both Republicans AND Democrats have used the "nuclear option", so you really can't point fingers at the Dems in particular, despite the fact that you're only 12, and can't remember any administration before Obama's.

>Democrat obstruction is as much as they can get away with, and it's entirely the reason Trump hasn't filled his cabinet yet.
So you're (correctly) claiming that the Dem's _can't _ filibuster a cabinet appointee, but they're still somehow (magically?) responsible for the last two vacancies, despite the fact that the Republicans have complete control over conformation process?

And check out this chart:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabinet_of_Donald_Trump#History
Trump's "weighted average" for appointees is shorter than the last 7 Presidents.

>> No.8106499 [View]
File: 95 KB, 475x428, 1463884546066.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8106499

There are two identical objects, i apply 5 newtons of force on the first and it moves, i do the same to the second object but it doesn't move, the chance of this happening is non-zero, in this hypothetical situation if the cause of the first objects movement is applying the force then what is the effect of the force application on the second object if the two objects are stationary?

>> No.8094495 [View]
File: 95 KB, 475x428, 1461150579573.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8094495

>>8094463
>>there are trillions of cells
>and for the most part we know what they are.
>The biochemistry is extensive but its a basic formula.

But you're specifically asking about the interactions of hundreds of billions of individual cells, then acting surprised that we don't understand an incredibly complicated process because we understand the actions of an individual neuron.

You can learn everything there is to know about a single transistor, but still not know a thing about computers.
It's like you're saying I should know all about fluid dynamics, just because I know a water molecule is one oxygen atom and two hydrogen atoms.

>> No.8090734 [View]
File: 95 KB, 475x428, 1461150579573.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8090734

>>8090730
>James
It's Bill, but you were really close.

>>8090730
>You are wrong on multiple levels.
At least I'm not a shitposter (at least in this thread).

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]