/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10717237
>This is the last response to you.
Just like the last one was supposed to be, eh?
>What is context? My first post was a response to a post ABOUT NTP.
Any chance you get to plug that shit study you do, don't pretend you haven't posted it out of the blue before.
>2600
Good for you, still doesn't change my point.
>That bring it up to the 10,000+ range
And yet you can't even post a single study which you believe to be reputable and conclusive. Says a lot.
>Guy, what don't you get here? You want to read a list without reading a list.
This CD ROM has 100,000 games on it anon, take my word for it that they're all quality and fun to play, even though I'm only going to show you what I believe to be one of the worse games in the collection.
>That's post 4 or something in the list, I don't know. It's obvious if you go through it.
Excuses excuses. In the time it took you to type that out you could've selected your best study. You do have a best study, don't you? You compiled the list after all, you should be very familiar with it by this stage.