/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15897798
The eugenic era didn't end in the 20th century; it's still in play.

Treatment was superior in the late 1700s until the 1850s, 1885. Then, the eugenics and genocide era began, got its full foothold on psyciatry. Treatment then went downhill, not wonder when focus shifted to torture and sterilization and genocide.

Additionally, I would like to add that individuals with schizophrenia are more easily prone to entering psychosis. The more exposure one has to tranquilizers or anti-psychotics, as they are now called, the worse the short, mid, and long-term outcomes become. In fact, anti-psychotics will keep you sicker for a longer duration and render you disabled and unable to work. Anti-psychotics do not exhibit any anti-psychotic properties, besides causing massive brain damage through atrophy, as well as brain disfunction. Anti-psychotics are directly involved with suicide and homicidal urges, alongside torture. APs also changes behviour in ways that makes it impossible to tell if the person is psychotic or having drug induced psychotic symptoms as well. This drug is paradoxial as fuck

Anti-psychotics morph brain structure so severely that one cannot distinguish between a lobotomized patient and someone who has been exposed to anti-psychotics at sufficiently high dosages and for an extended period. With this we now see a drug that exhibits neurotoxic properties. It also damages every organ in the body directly or indirectly through alteration in behavior.

Let's compare some statistics between torture and anti-psychotic treatment versus no torture and no anti-psychotics. See the related image for details.