/sci/ - Science & Math

What do you make of this book?

How bullshit is this book/ infinite parallel universes? Is the copenhagen interpretation still relevant in todays quantum physics landscape or are scientists really starting to believe that quantum superpositions create new universes?

>>11123219
>on it's way it breaks it's own reality instead of advancing in a linear fashion of progress
Not in the case of physical constants. The mass of Hydrogen does not change.

>science creates an abstract reality and goes from there it is not reality itself
It's almost like you're saying there is no reality itself. This Kantian bullshit doesn't fly anymore.

>>11123227
All those dogmatic brainlets are like this guy: >>11123219

>>9422659
Not him, but you should read this. It doesn't describe a new model per se, but delves into the idea that the universe actually is mathematics, rather than is described by mathematics. In particular, it's a mathematical object. So in that regard, it's kind of neo-monism.

>>9313326
Everything is maths, my son. Read this.

>>8752122
the universe

is

math

ok so the universe is made out of math

but whyyyyyy