/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16078341
>More like they're still training the flight computers on what angle of the grid fins gets what response. Superheavy was overcompensating in one direction and then swinging back too far in the other direction.
I would have assumed that this is the kind of thing they would get right with simulations desu.
>whatever kept the engines relighting
Could this likely (but not necessarily) be damage from the oscillation? Or improper fuel flow due to oscillation?
Was fuel for the relighting coming from a full sub-tank in the booster? Or is that unneeded because the booster slowing down in the atmosphere will keep the fuel at the bottom of the tank?