/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6979093
>hominem
>hominid
i see the pun is lost on you.

>what does this prove? civilization started in the middle east and spread from there. it hadnt spread to sub-sahara yet so they were primitive.
Demonstrably false. There are multiple cradles of civilization. One in China, one in Mesoamerica, etc etc. Civilization has arisen independently in many areas, but never in Africa or Australia.

>no. race has no reasonable scientific definition.
forensic anthropology for 500 alex.

>there is only one extant sub-species of Homo sapiens. subspecies dont come into it.
just saying that over and over again doesn't make it true

>so? heaps of professors are crackpot embarassments to their univeristy.
Watson. Watson. Watson.


>>6979139

>Race at this point becomes arbitrary because now that we know gene combinations can influence pregnancy duration every and any distinct genetic setup is likely to have their own time period.

Yes, and these gene combinations correspond with anthropological defined races.

>Because we know social factors can influence sexual selection, diet and gene expression. Which in turn effects population genetics, we just don't know exactly how long it takes for the results to set in.

Yes, actually there is a theory is that civilization caused this selection which resulted in the current differences between races. You have literally made a racialist argument while arguing against racialism.