/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16069838
>you can't answer how something that gets destroyed in the interaction can be accurately measured by the thing destroying it before a measurement can be completed
how do you destroy something without making a measurement? how do you interact with something without making a measurement? you do understand that interaction and measurement are the exact same thing, right? you can't measure without interacting, you can't interact without making a measurement.
>No to infinity and especially not a step past infinity which is what you were originally asking.
No, my illiterate friend, I asked you to divide reality an arbitrarily infinite amount until you reach the limit you supposed is the basis of reality, "infinite" chosen as an arbitrary value as it would be indeterminate how many steps is between, say, an atom and your presupposed limit.
>An infinite number of steps is definitely too hard for me or anything else.
And yet reality functions just fine, not too hard for it and since you are a direct extension of reality it shouldn't be too hard for you, but with an attitude like that you will never begin to comprehend.
>What is 1 step past infinity is a much different question and it is incoherent and retarded which is why you asked it
No I asked you to divide reality down to your presupposed limit and answer what that final layer is made of, if not of any constituent parts, you've yet to give a proper answer.

>>15968032
Less than 2

>>15864547
Brainlet cope, if you can't visualize entire realities in your head you are low IQ

>>15808189
>calling io a planet
>implying earth isnt a churning volcano planet

>>15453750
>And you'd call going extinct because you are unable to have children "thriving?"
And that didn't become a problem until subhumans started being imported in, which by law of causality implies that people were better off before, ergo they're not thriving and they're just dragging down everyone else with them.

>>14883665
>balls travel along the wire

>>14839239
>8/(4+4)

That was a common factor you dumb fuck

Its
8 / 4 + 4
2+4
6

>>14539790
>IQ