/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7089651
>Eight bodies with a vested interest were organized to deny the obvious and call it impartial investigation.

That's the ticket, isn't it, I've noticed this with all conspiracy theorists - any credible bodies that disagree with the conspiracy theory are "in on it." It's an easy way to hand-wave evidence against your claims.

It's a good thing that random science-illiterate 4chan posters can punch through the facade of this global-scale conspiracy upheld by every credible science institution!

/sci/ likes to say that the soft sciences aren't rigorous but they are a lot more rigorous than 99% of the arguments I see on /sci/.

You would think that for a forum that commonly argues IQ, race "realism," climate denial, etc. wouldn't suddenly care so much about rigor.