/sci/ - Science & Math

What does it even mean to "complete anything in cohomology"?

I know the definition of cohomology and I've seen a few examples. And most importantly I figured out that it doesn't interest me. There are sufficiently many other math topics which I find more interesting and which don't involve cohomologies.

Could it possibly be that OP's criticism applies to himself the most? That maybe he is an undergraduate babby who took a glimpse at an introductory algebraic toplelogy course and now believes himself to be superior to 99% o /sci/?