[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.9114009 [View]
File: 245 KB, 510x331, rock[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9114009

what are the different kinds of rocks

>> No.8419718 [View]
File: 245 KB, 510x331, rock.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8419718

>>8419699
>Let me guess, it's problematic for you to masturbate your shaft,
I don't follow. What do you mean? I masturbate with a grip on various parts of the shaft, and sometimes hold my foreskin back tight and massage the shaft skin or "tug". Lot of ways to do it.

>Push your finger into the fat rolls on your stomach and rub the flab over the tip of your finger?
I have a low body fat content. Never thought of someone being able to do that though. Very creative.

>>8419701
>>8419705
I don't get it.

>> No.8306025 [View]
File: 245 KB, 510x331, rock.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8306025

I had a realization this morning.

Why are we bothering to bomb people? Instead of spending money on munitions, feeding the military industrial complex, we could just get a big steel crate and fill it with rocks, then drop it on people. Larger crates for groups, standard size crates for individuals. It would be a lot more cost effective. We could make use of our drone technology to deploy a targeted precision strike of a small, but still decidedly lethal, box of rocks. Fuel consumption would probably be lower as well.

If we run out of rocks would could just start loading the crates with money. It would still be more cost effective.

How many rocks on average do you think we'd need for each crate type? I'm thinking it would be more effective to just use a few large rocks and accept the inefficient use of space, rather than dealing with thousands of small pebbles.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]