/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10258892
I think that proves my point. dT is not well predicted by dCO2 for that data. dCO2 is about constant, dT is jumping around all over the place.

>Emissions have been exponentially increasing
It's technically exponential but pretty close to linear, pic related, CO2 = k+Aexp(ct) where c is close to 0. A logarithmic response to an almost linear function is going to be almost logarithmic.

>Use scientific facts in your answer
no u
"climatologists say it's bad" is a sociological fact not a scientific one.

>What is "much more?
Orders of magnitude more that what's already in the air per degree of warming, a logarithmic response.