/sci/ - Science & Math

I believe trying to convince anyone of anything is a simple repetition of information and in time the persons own ability to either justify or detest all information put in front of them. I don't believe I know 'truth', only what I experimentally have found, and what I hope to experimentally explore. Math being the logical proving grounds to ceoncepts , experiments are the physical reality that math aught to be used to describe. As such I feel it relevant and desirable to post on /sci/ to engage in what will likely be a heated response based on my current ideas due to their opposition to most things past 1920. Arguably the trouble started with the photoelectric effect idea, to quote Steinmetz, "Unfortunately, to a large extent in dealing with dieletric fields the prehistoric conception of the eletrostatic charge (eletron) on the conductor still exists, and by its use destroys the analogy between the two components of the eletric field, the magnetic and the dieletric, and makes the consideration of the dieletric fields unnecessarily complicated."

To me, when such a theory as this exists and has a substantial amount of math and experemental evidence to me the concept of action at a distance is possibly one of the most confusing concepts possible. I find the biggest difference fundimentally between concepts is that the speed of light is a simple constant, not a binding limit.

If possible there be any Eletrical Engineers here I would love to hear what your idea of 'ground' is, and if ever you have had phenomena witnessed by you that contridicts what you were taught.

I also welcome the shit posters, but not the 'free energy' posters. They may rot in hell for the most foolish endevour.