/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14592254
Sounds like a whole lot of not my problem that you can't read.
>>14592261
Already wrote that in the reply. It is less safe because it doesn't work against covid. Meaning what risks do exist are needless to boot.

That means even in a vacuum disregarding covid, because ivermectin is ineffective it is therefore a pointless added risk however small. By definition that means even in that condition it is less safe.

>>14550659
Because all you have to do is show "with" vaccination, not "from" vaccination.

What's the matter guys, don't like that distinction anymore?

>>14536815
>yes, i know better. i know logic leads absolutely nowhere.
That's some neat logic you got goin on there