/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5728008
>That's all I was saying.
I simply cannot allow such stupidity in my fortress of ass made diamonds

>the rest
The instinct is something of previous basis for reaction to react in a specific and unvarying way, logic defies this as we know it, as it is in a 'higher' (hue) truth that our premise for it is reliant on those intuitive and, the point, instinctual interpretations to bring us to those places, so it is paradoxical to disregard them.

Now when you account for this plainly and constantly you, A: Do it to the extent of us bitching about it or B: constantly excel the B.S. scenario to realism by acknowledgement of relations that bring it forth, now, the real point, of philosophy, is to distinguish those boundries IE: Of Calculus's

>captcha related
At the end of the (adiec[?]) is I4D or IAD, this being indicative of a miscommunication of shapes which can be described in terms of forms (that or my screens shitty resolution is catching up with me, haha... and as it happens I did type it in wrong)