/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3129832

I'm still waiting for the proof.

>>3085279
Absolutely agree.

is there any chance of your research ever reaching the general public?
or is it done, then slapped with a classified sticker and never seen agian?

is it possible to find the frequency of an AC source, given the rms voltage, the rms amperage, and the capacitance of a capacitor within the circuit?

i don't there's any equation which can relate it all. the closest is possibly the equation for capacitive reactance, but the reactance is unknown

>1864

Get the fuck outta here

>>2947230
see, this is the kind of person we should be educating

i'm actually writing a paper right now attempting to do just this; dispel myths and misconceptions. Here's the draft so far if anyone would like to read it and leave some comments

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zaH4oQtOV7FC02e3Zx1yVm5IrauJRAagiUu0tKjfr5g/edit?hl=en&authk
ey=CKvIs4wG#

i'm like the number 1 fan of cold fusion as a theoretical energy source

but i'm really skeptical about these guys. no release of data or designs? the only peer reviewed article doesn't mention specifics? fishy as shit

but i'll find a live stream of the stockholm testing, the absolute second it works, and its legit, i'm putting all my money on these guys and buying on for my basement

φ = -2sin(666°)

How much ENERGY is needed to make and recycle a solar panel compared to the energy it will harvest in it's useful life?

>:P
>I am 14 years old

At least make it Geophysics.
(Amundsen-Scott south pole station: "Research at the station includes glaciology, geophysics, meteorology, upper atmosphere physics, astronomy, astrophysics, and biomedical studies. "

If travelling is the only reason you'd like it and you don't give two shits about rocks... quit while you're ahead.

so it's a fluid, but it's still gas and not liquid

>mfw this is not a huge revelation and doesn't change anything

/sci/
any tips for the current job market? specifically internships?
i'm a junior software engineering and/or network security major, i have no plans to go into grad school and instead jump headlong into the market. i'm asking /g/ this as well, but you guys seem to be actually employed

-how do i make myself stand out?
-how exactly should i apply, just a resume drop or try to meet some people in person?
-are sites like monster and snagajob good, and how do i make myself stand out on a site like that?

just general stuff

EMPLOYMENT GENERAL i guess

Whats the one where you are an athiest, but you arent really because you never even thought about if theres a god or not, you just always never believed in god from birth.
And athiest weights up the options and chooses, whereas this thing isnt like that, i cannot remember the word. But its me. Raised without faith, didnt really know what religion even was til i was 11.

Waiting patiently

>>2620566

Yeah? Show me how I'm wrong. Bear in mind that the question was based solely on the data given, which is a 58:42 ratio in the coin tosses.

Calculate the probability of a successful relationship (probability of 7 yes answers in 16 out-askings (50:50 prob. for single event)), then multiply by the area bounded by the graph of x²+(y-|x|^1/3)² = 1, if result is an irrational transcendental number then do it.

Calculate the probability of a successful relationship (probability of 7 yes answers in 16 out-askings (50:50 prob. for single event)), then multiply by the area bounded by the graph of x²+(y-|x|^1/3)² = 1, if odd = don't do it, even = do it.

Notice how quiet this thread is? It's because you're an asshole. No, I can't prove you that, at least without giving it a thought and thus wasting my time, something which I am not going to do.

There's a principle called Occam's razor. Basically it goes like this: There is absolutely no reason to assume that some looney tunes level bullshit perversion of a physical phenomenon will take place that will suddenly make the observed object cease to exist when the observer looks away, and make it reappear once it is observed again.

I rest my case. I mad.

>>2525543
This.

Learn from your intellectual superiors, and perhaps even surpass them.

"If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?"

Yes it does.

Post ITT if you agree this is the stupidest
"philosophical" question ever and reflects the retarded triviality of philosophy when taken over the top.

My opinion on the subject: Governments shouldn't be made smaller, rather have less interfering power and be far more geared to providing its citizens with the best services and protective laws as possible. This means that they would have laws to protect consumers and workers from the usual corporate shenanigans but have less power in telling corporations exactly how they should do shit.

Also i don't give a fuck what you say, the taxrate on corporations earning over 500 million a year should be 70% of profits.

>>2455582
>Divide by zero, how does it work?!

Okay, here ya' go.

Let's do some long division.

Take a number, any number, lets say "1".

Subtract 0.
Then subtract 0.
Subtract 0 again.
Keep subtracting 0 until you can no longer subtract 0 without a positive result.

Get back to me when you're done.

Atheists vs Christians.
GO!

>>2426729

Miniluv and the thinkpol would like to have a word with you for this doubleplusungood crimethink