/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6103217

>>5739001
Not keeping pace
> >>5739002

>>5728479
>>5728484
ITT: Fear fags on a science board

shooo OP, shooo out away shoo

>>5690504
lolnoitsmagic

I'm going to counter argue you

At the basis of our perception is the recognition that all composures are as recompiled conditioned recognitions, the fact that one can not always see the illusion, or occasionally both at the same time, is a failure of the individual to anticipate the bounds of their perception, as opposed to simply lacking it, and redistribute their perception to a non-locallity in their interpretation, IE: The new. The failure is not one of any developed or conditioned evolution in psych, but a failure to interpret themselves easily as something unknown, or as not seeing their interpretation as THE interpretation, as apposed to what is available to develop.

>>5687277
>.
As to say that from an angle an area would acquire a blind spot? We live in rotations buddy the way things work well account for that

>mfw I'm working as an explosives production engineer for Orica and I never took anything above college level maths.

You never USE that shit unless you want to be be a super high flying consultant. I'm on 110k making sure shit works the way it should do and doesn't blow up. The ability to manage people and projects is waaaay more important than turning into an azn calculator for maths.

>also that feel when you realise you'll never use 90% of what gets shoved down your throat in university

>>5654677
>>5654681

Its painful to watch you struggle, man

>>5648333
>There faces

>>5609820
>tfw circles are .99999

>>5587029
>tfw if I actually finished math in HS i'd help because well played

owait actually red your qeustion

97cents?
Well that's about 237 rupies
4 bills
3 wood coins
5 plastic ones

>>5540302
>No.
It's an experiment to determine the answer 2+2 is the experiment 4 is what you work with in the next area. An equation is not at an answer, it's a question or an applicable formula to achieve it- and the experiment should yield the results you predicted because the results are only the ones you are predicting

>No.
It's a word in a dictionary to use it otherwise is narrow minded

>It is complete
xRy is non-definitive, it is incomplete by your example, giving it definition just proves my point, unless you are to say that knowledge is something that on it's own is indefinitive, which is what you are implying, and is something that I could agree with on the bases of it is only defined by the context it is set.

>I am not ignoring a point, I literally cant understand you.
A: I corrected it & B: it's saying basically what I said in the line before

>What does notation even have to do with this?
>Notation having nothing to do with how/what we determine of things
>ishyddt

>>5491821
>pre-time has no value

Confirmed Retard (yet prospectively accurate)

>>5491821
>pre-time has no value

Confirmed Retard (yet perspective accurate)

>>5480203
>mfw you think its worse

>>5473479
HA!

I would say it has to do with their lack of knowing anything of beauty. They give such depth to their terms while in flight that they rarely think to look back and grasp of them, if they did they might give credit to the fact that it is not them that is undead sculpting their words but the work of generations previous, and as such do they totally disregard how everything they are is literally not even their own but somebody elses hot air

>>5469517
>tfw time is barely a moment

>>5426576
also, that zero must be considered a number do to negative numbers

Equatably the sum of all but the sum of nothing do to the fact that things arnt composed of numbers but iteracting numbers

the tl;dint rite being stringthoery esk out the yingyang

>mfw all the ultra hard sci-fi fags claiming that you can't have negative mass or exotic matter for Alcubierre warp drive now have to contend with negative temperatures and still tell me that exotic matter is impossible

AIDS.

Been swimming recently?

>>5352687

>>5320875

>what is exactly ''soft'' about biology?

The boobs of all the girls that take it

>mfw engineers thinking they will get rich near me

>>5031441

What makes you think biology belongs on /sci/?

We use the Mass Effect