/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8825974
>putting indians so low
>putting whites equal to asians
This will hurt.

rs10457441:
European avg: 0.53 South Asian avg: 0.28
rs10119:
European avg: 0.71 South Asian avg: 0.79
rs11584700:
European avg: 0.23 South Asian avg: 0.25
rs4851266:
European avg: 0.39 South Asian avg: 0.25
rs236330:
European avg: 0.77 South Asian avg: 0.9
rs17518584:
European avg: 0.63 South Asian avg: 0.49
rs7923609:
European avg: 0.51 South Asian avg: 0.48
rs17522122:
European avg: -0.51 South Asian avg: -0.56
rs2721173:
European avg: -0.54 South Asian avg: -0.41
Average Mexican frequency: 0.496666666667
Average European frequency 0.524444444444
For comparison - Average East Asian frequency 0.608
Source: 1000 genomes project

So basically the difference between east asians and whites is bigger than the difference between south asians(poo in loo etc) and whites - WHY would that be??
here's why>>8826099

now the question is - is it possible that the biggest contributors (in GWAS) are all distributed in this way by coincidence, is it probable that some other less important intelligence genes are distributed in a completely different way - the answer is NO it's not a coincidence and NO it's not probable

Here's some food for thought on Mexicans. Using the SNP's on the right(identified via GWAS studies to be worth around 0.3 iq points difference each) I can compare Europeans to Mexicans (living in LA).

rs10457441:
European avg: 0.53 Mexican in LA: 0.28
rs10119:
European avg: 0.71 Mexican in LA: 0.8
rs11584700:
European avg: 0.23 Mexican in LA: 0.1
rs4851266:
European avg: 0.39 Mexican in LA: 0.33
rs236330:
European avg: 0.77 Mexican in LA: 0.84
rs17518584:
European avg: 0.63 Mexican in LA: 0.64
rs7923609:
European avg: 0.51 Mexican in LA: 0.7
rs17522122:
European avg: -0.51 Mexican in LA: -0.63
rs2721173:
European avg: -0.54 Mexican in LA: -0.45
Average Mexican frequency: 0.512222222222
Average European frequency 0.524444444444
Source: 1000 genomes project

Now obviously there's more genes involved, but probabilistically it's hard to imagine that the most significant SNP's won't show a difference if there actually was a difference.

This basically proves that an IQ gap can be mostly environmental in nature.

/pol/ should be ecstatic about this. I imagine they won't be though.

>>8799027
what?
even if you read it through /pol/ eyes this renders races as proxies for intelligence completely obsolete

for reasons that should be obvious

>>8791493
history did not start a 100, 200 or 300 years ago and it hasn't ended yet
i am just posting some facts and putting things in perspective
it's simply impossible to deny asians are brianier
>>8791519
a link itt proves you wrong
i am guessing your racial politics prevented you from seeing it
>>8791517
3 points is the lowest estimate of the racial difference in intelligence, where east asians are given their lowest possible score and whites their highest