/sci/ - Science & Math

Insufficient data to conclude the extent of the heredity/environment interaction causing the inequality.

Since almost wholly heritable correlates to intelligence, like myopia and brain size differ between groups, suggest at least a moderately relevant inherited division exists.

The fact that the gaps in test scores increase by the complexity and g-loading of the task seems to suggest that the differences have a substantial biological basis. Note that "biological" does not mean "innate". Merely that things like prenatal environment or perhaps early nutrition are going to almost solely account for any non-inherited differences.

Now that I've said that, the popularity of "hard egalitarianism" (usually in circles that are misinformed about the topic) is wholly unsubstantiated by the data in any related field. They really have no evidence to fulfill their own burden of proof.

Working Memory Training

Huge Creatine Dosage

Neurofeedback (possibly)

Cardiovascular exercise

Stimulants may increase specific executive functions, but not G.

Some nootropics may be effective, but research on supplemental cognitive enhancement is sorely lacking.

Your reaction to any of these methods will vary based upon your current cognitive ability, your biology, and whether or not they are even valid.

That is all

>>5356006
>>5356006

>that hilarity when opposition is reduced to wild strawmen arguments

used in ultrasound to look at babbys

Which is just an application of this:
>>3561547