/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12138679
>She's already gone.

>>12132547
>infinite complexity

>They all said no
same. all seven said no.

>>11189668
I permaban them from the social order then.

>>11083650
>Am_I_Retarded.png
No, that is a good and insightful question

What is the deal with this?

The limit of sine, I believe I have proven, is zero and the limit of cosine is one. The limits at infinity are the same as the limits at the origin, if my proof is devoid of any unfixable errors, which I believe it is. I have a section called, "Refutation of proof of non-existence of limits of sine and cosine at infinity." If you are familiar with that proof, then you may find this section insightful.

Proof of the Limits of Sine and Cosine at Infinity
http://www.vixra.org/abs/1809.0234

>>10941324
I don't know who the "our" is that you mention as uncorrelated. More than 90% of my main personal problems can be cured with money, and if you will buy my book, then I will be really glad to make that $4 off of you. Also, it is a really great book that I think you will enjoy if you like fiction, and its spine will look good gathering dust on any bookshelf.

You say you don't want to read the whole paper, but is only eight paragraphs and very short. I encourage you to read it if you are very well-versed in the cosmology jargon. It's really so short, there is no way to TLDR it. The TLDR I wrote for the other guy earlier was practically longer than the paper. I post my papers because I am always hoping that someone can point out real technical flaws. I do not make these threads to invite insults and shit-flinging, I do it because honest criticism is invaluable, and I have corrected my own errors very many times based on the feedback I've gotten between the retards spamming my serious posts with their idiocy.

Most of my physics paper have a lot of my opinion about directions forward in them, but lately I switched research direction from phys to math. I have the paper above and this other very strong paper, very scholarly in the usual style, and I would welcome anyone to read criticism them.

Real Numbers in the Neighborhood of Infinity
http://www.vixra.org/abs/1811.0222

>>10780922
oh wait... maybe actually

>>10616200
>This usually has to be done numerically.

What rumors?

>>10134823
>I fucking had to make it like that because I could never pin down exactly what he claimed to have said.

>>10118326
>you're not going to convince them that R exists.
interesting

>>10118370
>A real number then is a regular sequence of rational numbers.
Could you explain what this technical definition means?

>>9992012
>there should be a rectangular tiling

>>9959333
>'variables in transit'
>English grammar

>>9907264
>ghost cities

>>9886916
>When will the tide finally turn?

>>9876251

>>9847225
how about you come help me?