/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15438660
so you're saying the crab bucket mentality only appears after the bucket has minimum number of crabs in it?

>>15419432
nearly all of science is fake and gay.
another case of too many cooks ruining the pudding.
the overwhelming amount of midwit wannabes and posers shut out the few qualifies individuals by leveraging the peer review process

>>15413285
physics is a low iq field of study, the low iq crab bucket crabs prevent anyone with a brain from participating

>>15413350

>>15339655
far too many
every last one of them is a welfare case that is 100x more demanding than the average welfare case, we should only fund the ones that produce a return on investment.

Increasing academic bureaucracy?
Opening up of universoties to non elite people?
Low hanging fruits season is over?
People are dumber?
The scientific culture of the 19 and early 20 centuries is dead and what we have now is a crude charicature?
Perverse incentives through the process of grants and meddling by industries into academic research?

>>15319338
>Quantity has a quality all its own.
it does not, just because you can regurgitate a stupid idiom doesn't make that true, any moron can play at the same game
>too many cooks spoils the broth

Enrico Fermi produced more science in one day using pencil & paper than Fermilab produces in a decade for $10 billion

>>15296871
you only get an idea of the subset who can't resist any and every opportunity to talk about themselves on social media - aka shameless self promoters. a common type in science and math and everyone knows commoners are low iq

>>15295154

>>15290571
low iqs colluding via the peer review process to censor higher iqs who challenge the low iqs' memorized conventional wisdom is a large part of why science has not progressed in more than half a century.
low iqs don't just innocently publish garbage, their crab bucket mentality also prevents everyone who isn't low iq from publishing non garbage

>>/sci/thread/15288371

>>15290571
low iqs colluding via the peer review process to censor higher iqs who challenge the low iqs' memorized conventional wisdom is a large part of why science has not progressed in more than half a century.
low iqs don't just innocently publish garbage, their crab bucket mentality also prevents everyone who isn't low iq from publishing non garbage

>>15249086
>The average scientist
thats the problem right there, scientists aren't supposed to be average, average people don't the intellectual nature and drive to do science, when given the opportunity to do science, average people only get in the way. so the average scientist is now no better than any other averages of midwits because become a scientist is no longer a merit based affair.