/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7716842
>[citation needed]
>also, I really wouldn't expect Russian science to be remotely objective about stuff that affects the oil industry, given the level of corruption there and the degree to which they rely on petroleum for their economy desu.

You think American/European government paid scientists are objective? Given the lefty results of "fighting climate change," (Massive wealth redistribution, more government, more carbon taxes. All goals of many politicians and most bureaucrats.) Seriously, there's no good reason to say that American/European scientists are more unbiased than Russian scientists. They all need their jobs.

>>6792862
>money

There are a lot of jobs, not to mention huge $$$tax money for federal government, and huge amounts of money for the United Nations to "redistribute" from rich countries to 3rd world countries.

>>6570699

>true believers in the gospel of Climate Change don't take you seriously

Of course they don't. But people who take the scientific method and data seriously are all I care about.

>>6487817

Yawn.

>http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/01/19/just-hit-the-noaa-motherlode/

Who cares?
I GAVE YOU THE ACTUAL DATA SOURCE!

There's something very wrong when you resort to knee jerk ad hominem ("its an evil denier therefore its false!) is all you do to "prove" something is wrong.

And yeah I looked:
>http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/ushcn/ushcn.html#QUAL

Again, no specific number provided. I showed from their own references that that the errors are not properly corrected for.

Your cognitive dissonance is awful. Sometimes something labeled "scientific" ain't. That's something that's very difficult for technical types to grasp.

So here's an explanation. What's the choice for the relatively small number of "scientists" who process global temperature data?

1. Do correct Urban Heat Island effect corrections and erase about 50% of Global Warming, thus making my job irrelevant, or
2. Do a sub-par correction and come up with a "qualitative justification" and maintain my salary and leave me able to say I'm saving the world!