/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15986385
>heads I win, tails you lose

>>15903282
This assumes that Earth's climate only has one variable.

>>15903276
The reality is that there are multiple variables when it comes to the temperature aspect of the Earth's climate, including reflectivity (known as albedo) of clouds and ice (white objects reflect heat, dark objects absorb heat), the ocean's capacity to absorb heat, and the Earth's ability to absorb greenhouse gasses.

The assumption that AGW advocates make is that carbon dioxide is a super-greenhouse gas, that the Earth absorbs carbon dioxide very slowly, and that there is no other explanation other than industrial pollution. However, all of these same points were made about other pollutants during the 1960's and 70's only in reverse, that they would cause a global ice age due to a cloud of smoke that would envelope the Earth. There is currently no model that has accurately predicted global temperature changes, and all changes either positive or negative are pre-assumed to be the result of AGW.

>>15817787
Please point to the correct climate model.

>>15732716
No prediction regarding Climate Change has been correct. It's all pseudoscience. When the observations don't fit the theory, just change the model.

>>15604063
>no citations