/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12165414
I can't interpret either of this sentences.
Are you defining a new logic
If "implies" is material implication, then "not x implies y" is equivalent to "x or y", so if this is false, both are already false.
There's logics that avoid the so called paradoxes of material implication, see e.g.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relevance_logic

It should be clear to you that nobdy but possibly you could understand the part where you start speaking of
>cardinality of free states (R^1).
Also, I'd not pull an Immanuel Kant and write a paragraph long sentence.