/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12616469
I'm self employed but I can't afford to pay myself. Is that NEET? (Buy my book.)

The last book I read and also the best one I read.

>>12607455
Rick and Morty got made from where someone stole the rough draft of my pic related book.

I wrote a novel as well.

>>12456659
>We are basically your base.
That must be why you don't buy my book then.

>>12373449
Probably.

>>12373516
I think one of the main reasons I got shipped to Antarctica is because my enemies know that you can't use intelligence to find success in a group of retards. Buy my book.

>>12338533
If I'm not mistaken, you all sabotage my scientific work *and* my literary work, and then you use my destitution as a predicate for why you ought to torment me.

>>12269630
I think it's more like
Axiom: Euclid is right
Theorem: RH is false

>>12149723
I spent about $50 or $100 advertising my book on Amazon. I read that they said you should get about one sale per 10 clicks and also so many clicks per ad view. I think I got to 100 clicks with no sales before I concluded that they were taking my money to run fake ads. My book looks hot. I should have easily met the sales per click average. I ought to have out-performed I think but in the simulated reality, they simulated the reality in which I did at least ten times worse than all the material said I should have expected to do, and was not able to generate a single sale. That's a big difference in the simulated reality from the real one.

>>12098452
And I am bitter, based sentiment analyzer. I am very, very bitter. I'd like to work with someone but I have no collaborators and I am a pariah at this point with my felony burglar nigger guy email spammer stuff on the internet, not to mention being held as a slave in Antarctica. Everyone says, "Get help." Few say, "I will help you."

>It could very well be that you just are not a good writer
It could not be that. I am a very good writer. Buy my book, btw, pic related. It's on amazon. I am not a very good at keyboarding, but I am as good at writing as I am at math and physics.

>just write them a counter proof?
A counter to what? If I could get peer-review, then I would be able. As long as I am denied peer-review, I cannot.There is a gimmick here: People say, "Did it pass peer review?" The answer is, "No." There is a connotation there that it failed peer review, but that is wrong. The truth is that it did not pass peer-review because it was never peer-reviewed.

> You sound very hostile towards people who critique your work
You are wrong again here. I am hostile to people who lie about my work and who say that the truth is a lie, and that facts are not facts, and try to pass off lies as if they are facts. I am highly grateful to people, however, who critique my work in the sense of constructive criticisms which reflect a subject matter expertise. My long paper reflects many such criticisms of my earlier RH papers and I was never hostile to those critics. I am hostile to the liars, however. I hope their children die.

>your job to prove them wrong without ad hominem or just saying "I'm right, they are wrong".
You must be fucking with me now, based sentiment analyzer. I go to great lengths to prove these people wrong. I do it over and over, even at the expense of getting my dick electrocuted when I reply to obvious bait criticisms posted by those who implant sexual torture devices into my penis in addition to shitting on the work I do.

>>12089548
You mean if I was a proficient enough social networked to get someone else to publish my book? I wrote a book about my physics research program. I published it online and it is available to download for free:
>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
>https://vixra.org/abs/1712.0598
I wrote LONG paper about my research program in math, and I guess you call it a short book but really it is a long paper. It's also free online:
>Fractional Distance: The Topology of the Real Number Line with Applications to the Riemann Hypothesis
>https://vixra.org/abs/1906.0237
I wrote a novel, too, which I have for sale:
>The Weather Vane
>https://www.amazon.com/Weather-Vane-Gedalia-Gershon/dp/1723762806
It is probably free online too but I prefer that you gibmedat for it.

Long paper (very short book?) explains a lot of good stuff about math. Starts with Euclid and goes up through high school with an advanced application at the end.

Fractional Distance: The Topology of the Real Number Line with Applications to the Riemann Hypothesis
https://gofile.io/d/gV8m2B also https://vixra.org/abs/1906.0237

ABSTRACT: Recent analysis has uncovered a broad swath of rarely considered real numbers called real numbers in the neighborhood of infinity. Here we extend the catalog of the rudimentary analytical properties of all real numbers by defining a set of fractional distance functions on the real number line and studying their behavior. The main results of are (1) to prove with modest axioms that some real numbers are greater than any natural number, (2) to develop a technique for taking a limit at infinity via the ordinary Cauchy definition reliant on the classical epsilon-delta formalism, and (3) to demonstrate an infinite number of non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function in the neighborhood of infinity. We define numbers in the neighborhood of infinity as Cartesian products of Cauchy equivalence classes of rationals. We axiomatize the arithmetic of such numbers, prove all the operations are well-defined, and then make comparisons to the similar axioms of a complete ordered field. After developing the many underling foundations, we present a basis for a topology.

>>11861482

>>11854785
great book

>>11603146
>Whereas an actual journal might get critical about a paper.
That would be a great professional result for me. It would be a big step up from the "your bullshit paper is not appropriate" response I usually get.

I would greatly prefer to have my work rightly featured in esteemed professional venues than to have it only on the derisively mocked viXra. If I could get published in a venue like that, then I could probably get my scientific career back on track, or at least a decent Patreon type of thing, like people buying my book. If I could get published, and certainly my results are worthy of publication in the objective reality that the biggest heretics in all of Christendom are supposed to be simulating, then that would help remedy this persistent state of indigent poverty in which I find myself.

>>11603183
based

read pic book

>Book recommendation

I wrote a book, available on Amazon, highly pertinent to science and mathematics, and all such things, but no one buys it.

>>11258669
I am the author of The Weather Vane, the book to which homage is given with these murals.