/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8739988

>>8721713
I found this channel last week and watched every single video. It's really entertaining. I can only wonder how he finds some of the dipshits he humiliates in World of Batshit (or why he tortures himself by doing so).

Any similar channels you know of? He recommended a bunch in that "next wave of skeptic channels" video, but I didn't really like any of them.

>>7732390
Thanks. Have an aurora.

For the topic, two last thoughts. This is based on our current understanding of the universe. There could be HUGE things just sitting out there that don't interact with light in the ways we expect. My handwaving could be like 1500s scientists dismissing atomism because something 'too small' to be able to see is ridiculous.
It's got a weird Lovecraft vibe, huge things that have been there for however long, that no one's noticed. Someone call an author because it creeps me out and I like that.

Second- if there was something too large to see, how would that work? Would it be transparent? Opaque but pitch black or visual noise? If it wasn't a single monolithic thing, like the earth, would you be able to resolve individual clumps or clods of it?
Actually, the closest thing I can think of to satisfy OP's question is a cold, naked neutron star. It's not especially huge, but I don't know if neutronium interacts much at all with light. It might just be a mass of faintly colored blobbiness surrounded by gravitational lensing.

>>7008876

My problem is I don't know how enhanced my pictures are.
I was going to post this guy >>6616768, but thought against it.