[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.12033506 [View]
File: 376 KB, 766x427, 1316669046392.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12033506

There's no point discussing Mars colonies before we can even have long duration habitat.

>> No.11097101 [View]
File: 376 KB, 766x427, 1564713262820.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11097101

>>11096812
>can't answer
>resort to troll
If you are too full of yourself to recognize space make thermal regulation easier than a hell varying between −17.2°C and −107°C there's no reason to answer you.

>>11096823
No one said the giant cylinder would come before the infrastructure. Don't confuse me with the martian who believe they'll 3D print their "new world" infrastructure from a few hundred BFR landed on Mars. The main difference is that I don't pretend a thousant people in thin can are colony until we've perfected self-sufficient space-habitat. Point at which scaling up is just a matter of economic efficiency and exploiting asteroids is a requirement

>>11096842
Say the guy who believe he won't need a small nation worth of industries and farm to expand his pod-camp on Mars.
The O'neill cyclinder you seem to imagine is the biggest thing you could make using TODAY materials with 30% margin (it's not even carbon nanotube). It's essentially suspension bridge technology and heavy lifting which we will need anyway.
Since it require self-sufficient colony in SPACE (of any size) before landing on Mars, all you've been saying is that you'll send a bunch of people dependent on space welfare, claiming to be a colony until they are sent an industrialized country in kit, or a magical 3D printer to do so.
I simply don't believe in your gravity hole frontier and build the industry in orbit, exploiting the moon, asteroid and still colonizing space.

>>11096860
No doubt but if you have that technology there, then you'll have it in space long before.

>>11096892
Which is why the industries want to bring the asteroid/resources to the station instead of the reverse. It's only the Pioneer dude who can't imagine people being anywhere but the surface of Mars.

>large scale asteroid mining for OTHER reasons
Whatever your other reason are, it will be before any mars colony.

>>11096913
It restrict severely the design with somewhat aerodynamic cargo spaceship, even using ballute.

>> No.3778777 [View]
File: 376 KB, 766x427, deepspacehabitat.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

Rigid capsules or inflatable ones?
Methods of radiation shielding?
Aboveground, or underground?
How many launches, using SLS vs. Falcon Heavy?

I know there's some design genius to be had on /sci/.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]