/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7728904
The antarctic is growing in ice/snow. Even NASA admits it. Could you be more disingenuous. More unfalsifiability.

warmist: Antarctic sea ice will shrink => reality: antarctic sea ice is growing
warmst: We meant land ice & snow => reality: NASA shows gaining snow/ice mass
warmist: Just ignore the regions we don't like.
Pic related: green is new sea ice, red is lost sea ice.

NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses

And yes, they predicted shrinking Sea Ice:
Detection of Temperature and Sea Ice Extent Changes in the Antarctic and Southern Ocean,
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADP007268

Greenhouse Gas–induced Climate Change Simulated with the CCC Second-Generation General Circulation Model
G. J. Boer , N. A. McFarlane , and M. Lazare
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/1520-0442%281992%29005%3C1045%3AGGCCSW%3E2.0.CO%3B2

>>7297990
>somewhat
Look at 1992
>>7297990
Stop wasting my time with your failed predictions and your after the fact excuses.

See pic.
Red = missing ice
Green = more ice

These days its a record levels. Sheesh, you are the embodiment of unfalsifiability.

>>7051351
>http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-03/uoca-ais022806.php

You've got to be kidding me. Purposefully trying to rewrite predictions of melting SEA ICE, by talking about land ice/snow. Pic related. Green area is new SEA ICE, red areas are missing SEA ICE.

And all that "missing LAND ice," largely replaced with LAND snow. No big deal. And the glacier ice melting is due to geothermic events.

Antarctic Thwaites glacier, considered the key to evaluating rising sea levels, is "actively melting in response to geothermal flux" from volcanoes' magma, a new study from the Institute for Geophysics at University of Texas, Austin finds.Researchers found that areas where the glacier showed greatest geothermal flux corresponded with "magmatic migration and volcanism."Unfortunately for global warming enthusiasts, geothermal warming is nature's handiwork.This study found under the glacier a "minimum average geothermal heat flow [of]... about 100 milliwatts per square meter, with hotspots over 200 milliwatts per square meter." Contrast that with the earth's continents, that have an "average heat flow... less than 65 milliwatts per square meter"

Again, thanks for trying to be tricky and rewriting predictions about SEA ICE into land ice, without saying it.

>>6434282

The original predictions were SEA ice EXTENT. They just moved the goal posts after their predictions FAILED. Like they always do.

Original Predictions:

Detection of Temperature and Sea Ice Extent Changes in the Antarctic and Southern Ocean,

http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADP007268

Greenhouse Gas–induced Climate Change Simulated with the CCC Second-Generation General Circulation Model
G. J. Boer , N. A. McFarlane , and M. Lazare

http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/1520-0442%281992%29005%3C1045%3AGGCCSW%3E2.0.CO%3B2

>>6330062

And it looks like I owe you some references... The basic climate models and there lack of accuracy is graphed in >>632894

Here are references for Warming and melting Sea Ice in the Antarctic:

Detection of Temperature and Sea Ice Extent Changes in the Antarctic and Southern Ocean,
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADP007268

Greenhouse Gas–induced Climate Change Simulated with the CCC Second-Generation General Circulation Model
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/1520-0442(1992)005%3C1045%3AGGCCSW%3E2.0.CO%3B2

I've attached a graph of Antarctic Sea Ice changes from 1992. New ice is in green, missing ice is in red.