/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10534778

>>9341303
>It's not how the physical mixing of light or dyes works. It's not how anything works.
>>9341381
>But what you don't understand, is that just because they can make the RYB system WORK, does not mean that it's the optimal system

>>8748388
>so you're proving my point. I didn't say one side or the other was solely responsible for the politicization, I just said the issue has become highly politicized
MOVING GOALPOSTS. Your intention was that "liberals" and "leftists" politicized the issue, I'm guessing you would have brought up Al Gore or some other bullshit like that before you decided to shift your argument.

You know damn well that your intent was to blame liberals / leftists on climate change being politicized, and are not backpeddling because the truth is conservatives led the effort.

>plenty of conservatives are also conservationists
An incredibly small minority, you're delusional. I'm conservative in many ways, but not when it comes to scientific progress and evidence. The vast majority of conservatives believe climate change is natural, or is a conspiracy, or any other variation of denial of the scientific evidence that exists.

Also, your entire "muh /pol/ is not one person" doesn't mean anything. There is a way of thinking on that board that drives it, you know this, you understand this, yet you dodge the issue. It's a reactionary circle jerk where any dissenting opinion is considered a "shill" or "CTR." You cannot post anything there that goes against the narrative / anti-Trump without either; being ignored, or being accused of being a shill, or any other variation, go ahead and see for yourself.

>>8552155
> the world's most famous logicians and mathematicians were highly religious
Your exact words bro.
And don't think I didn't notice that only two of those guys contributed anything within the past 100 years. Newton did a lot of work trying to mathematically analyze the Bible and studying demons. He thought that the philosopher's stone was a real thing and actively tried to make it through alchemy. Should we just give credence to any old thing some philosopher from the 1600s believed?

>>8493875