/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10401144
>trust a nobody filmmaker who actually claims "it's harder to fake something than to do it for real"

Right, fair argument, not like there's hours of evidence of the shoddily edited and produced work of "space missions" compiled all over the net showing what a mockery the space programs truly are. So many bubbles in space, a terribly dangerous place, don't forget to bring a towel.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHwxne9jnBE

>>10317589
>CO2 is transparent to visible light
>but yet reflective to infrared
>you know, infrared, the adjacent spectrum
Nice irreplicable pseudoscience you spouted there, m8.
Please, provide one example of an observable experiment which proves this claim. I'll wait.
In the mean time, check this out

https://co2islife.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/climate-alarmists-dont-understand-the-basics-of-the-scientific-method/

>>10115962
>>10115989
Here's an easy one. If the CO2 molecule is capable of trapping solar radiation bouncing off the surface of earth, which admittedly has more spectral spread than insolation, yet is obviously much more diffuse and attenuated, how is it possible that CO2 would not block insolation in equal if not greater measure to the ratio of diffuse bounced radiation which it allegedly 'traps creating a greenhouse effect'?

>>9604342