/sci/ - Science & Math

So is light fluidic or crystalline

If both, how so?

Anyway, see yah tommorow with a bump

>>5610915
[tries to salvage animilistic integrity by giving previous citation on fallibility of context]

>>5575778
>black hole is not a thing
>the fourth dimension is actually scientific

Accuracy is the point of the game is it not? If you know you're not accurate then why not say? Disillusioning other people for your own arrogance is pretty weak

....& like dafuq?

>>5491869
sure, yeah I really don't even understand what it's supposed to mean, other than essentially any numbers infinitive definition as depicted in the negative(under the premise of 0.999..=1) can be any number whatever equation you put beside it- basically how any number can by its only self definition be any number
>or how numbers in general are bullshit
But it essentially goes the way it does, that under the premise of numbers as infinitives can have multiple- but limited to 1- second premise

But otherwise the only way you can logically say it's nine without saying it's somehow over nine, and the lowest attributable being 9 on the tail end of the infinite is 2, but again in no way can it be higher that nine which is what is being said is by adding that lil negative sign, and at that just as well might be said as = to -2 and THAT goes as far to say that there's a -2 out there that isn't existing, not -0.0002 but as defined by some other completely arbitrary number that that considered whole number might as well be at the tail end of an infinite- which is true in it's own way at that number and adds to the argument that 0=infinity

Covered alot of stuff so spread your answer out if you think any of it is false